Backend & Platform Engineer
I build backend-heavy products that are easier to run, inspect, and ship.
This is one of them. Try a live scan below — it runs the full StageFlow pipeline against any public URL.
Enter any public URL above and press Enter to run a live accessibility scan via StageFlow
2
Flagship products
StageFlow and AlchemizeCV carry the clearest shipped proof in this portfolio.
280+
Automated checks
Testing spans API behavior, browser flows, and release confidence work.
Solo
End-to-end ownership
Architecture, UI, deployment, and operational cleanup stay in the same feedback loop.
Flagship Work
Start with the projects that best show how I operate.
I lead with proof, not a generic project grid. These two case studies show the mix I care about most: backend architecture, operator-facing product work, and delivery decisions that survive real use.
Working Style
What I tend to be responsible for when the work matters.
I am usually strongest where architecture and delivery meet: the parts of a product that need clear system boundaries, understandable UI, and enough operational rigor that the work does not collapse under real usage.
Backend systems that stay inspectable
I like event flows, clear state boundaries, and operational surfaces that explain what the system is doing without needing tribal knowledge.
Product interfaces for technical work
The UI work matters because operators need trust. I spend time on hierarchy, evidence, and interaction clarity, not just endpoint wiring.
Testing that supports shipping
Accessibility checks, browser automation, and integration coverage are part of delivery, not cleanup after the fact.
Single-host deployment discipline
I work comfortably close to the machine: containers, reverse proxying, systemd, and release workflows that make rollback and debugging sane.
Hiring
Looking for someone who can own both the system and the proof around it?
I am a strong fit for backend, platform, and full-stack roles where the work includes architecture, operator UX, testing discipline, and deployment ownership instead of splitting those concerns apart.

